← Feasnap
Investor overview
FFeasnap

Investor overview · October 2026

Find out if the site pencils before you've spent on plans

Feasnap is a product in development for Independent Small-Scale Duplex and Townhouse Developers.

In developmentFounding-member applications open

The problem

Independent Small-Scale Duplex and Townhouse Developers

For small-scale duplex and townhouse developers running the numbers themselves — where a 10% cost blowout can wipe out the entire profit on a 3-4 unit project.

  • A typical small duplex nets a profit margin of under 10% — thin enough that a cost blowout, low valuation, delay or soft market can wipe it out entirely.
  • It's easy to anchor on the cheapest builder quote you can find rather than the real cost, and only find out the gap once you're committed.
  • Construction costs rose 5.9% in the year to June 2026, the fastest pace since 2023 — so a feasibility spreadsheet built on last year's numbers is already out of date.
8.6% the typical profit margin on a small duplex project — thin enough that a small cost blowout, low valuation, delay or weak market can wipe it out Riser ↗

In their own words

Real quotes from the people who have this problem

They know it costs $1.5 million to build, but they think, if I go to enough builders I'll find someone who's really keen...and I'll get it for $1.35 million.
Property developer, Property Mastermind podcast

The evidence

Researched before anything is built

How it scores

Pain 3/5
How often it hits 4/5
Willingness to pay 4/5

1 documented complaints about the tools they use today

Where the evidence came from

News & reports 5
Paid templates 1

Based on 6 direct quotes from 6 independent public sites, each recorded with its source. Scores are 1–5, rated from that evidence.

Why now

What’s changed

  1. 01

    NSW's low- and mid-rise housing reform made dual occupancies and semi-detached dwellings permissible across every R2 low-density zone statewide from 1 July 2024, opening around 188,000 previously-ineligible lots to small-scale duplex development. Mills Oakley ↗

  2. 02

    House construction prices rose 5.9% in the year to June 2026, the fastest annual pace since the June 2023 quarter — a feasibility built on last year's cost benchmark is increasingly likely to be wrong. ABS Producer Price Indexes, June 2026 ↗

  3. 03

    A typical small duplex already runs on an ~8.6% margin, so the rising cost of a feasibility mistake is colliding with costs that are moving faster than they have in three years. Riser ↗

The product

Feasnap

Feasnap is a guided feasibility check built specifically for 1-4 unit duplex and townhouse sites. Enter the site, land price and unit count, and it runs the full residual-land-value calculation against current regional construction costs and council contribution rates — flagging a thin margin, a low contingency or a stale comparable before you spend on plans, instead of leaving you to catch it yourself in a spreadsheet.

  1. 01

    Enter the site address, land price, and the unit count you're considering — duplex, triplex, or up to four townhouses.

  2. 02

    Feasnap runs the residual-land-value calculation against current regional construction cost and council contribution benchmarks, and flags anything that looks thin — a sub-10% margin, a contingency under 10%, or a stale comparable sale.

  3. 03

    Download a report showing the numbers and the flags, so you go into a site — or a loan application — with the real picture, not a guess.

Concept preview
FFeasnap
Site check Cost benchmarks Past checks Reports Settings
Site check: sample duplex siteResidual land value, margin and contingency against current regional benchmarks.
Download report
Projected margin8.6%
Contingency held6%
Cost benchmarkThis quarter
Margin below bufferProjected margin is 8.6% against a 10% minimum buffer
Review
Contingency under-allowed6% held vs 10% recommended for a 2-lot site
Flag
Construction cost benchmarkChecked against this quarter's rate for the postcode
Current
Council contribution rateChecked against the current LGA schedule
Current

Market size

TAM, SAM and SOM

TAMTotal market
A$1.03M a yearAbout 11,570 duplex/townhouse projects a year (34,716 ABS-approved semi-detached/row/terrace/townhouse dwellings annually, assuming ~3 dwellings per project) × A$89 per feasibility check. ABS Building Approvals, Australia ↗
SAMServiceable market
A$773K a yearAbout 75% of those projects, assumed to be one-off or occasional builds rather than repeat professional developers who'd go straight to a full subscription platform — using the ~75% share of property investors who hold just a single property as a proxy for how many small developers are occasional, not professional. Property Update ↗
SOMObtainable in 3 years
A$15.5K a year2% of SAM — about 170 projects a year — within three years.

Sizes assume the working price of A$89 per feasibility check, which isn't validated yet. The 3-dwellings-per-project and 75%-occasional splits are assumptions, not measured figures, and the 2% share is an assumption, not a forecast.

Competition

What they use today, and where it falls short

Today’s optionScoped to 1-4 unit sitesBuilt-in sanity checksNo monthly commitmentCurrent regional cost data
Full feasibility platforms (subscription)Priced and built for an ongoing project portfolio (around A$149/month), overkill for someone checking a single site once.PartlyYesNoYes
Free or cheap static templatesStill a blank spreadsheet with no built-in sanity checks or current regional cost data — the same error risk this is about.PartlyNoYesNo
Hiring a quantity surveyor or consultantCosts more and takes longer than a self-serve check, and is usually engaged after a site is already under contract.PartlyYesYesYes
No check at all — gut feelThe riskiest option: margin and cost assumptions never get stress-tested before money is committed.NoNoYesNo
FFeasnapscoped to 1-4 unit duplex and townhouse sites specifically, with built-in sanity checks and current regional cost data, for a one-off fee instead of a subscription built for repeat developers.YesYesYesYes

Business model

Pay-per-report, no subscription

Working price A$89 per feasibility check Not yet validated — founding members lock in their price.

Working price, not yet validated — priced as a fraction of a quantity surveyor's fee or a subscription platform's monthly cost.

A single Feasnap check costs a fraction of what a thin margin has at stake

Feasnap, per check A$89
Full feasibility platform, per year A$1,788
Profit on a typical duplex a blowout could wipe out A$150,500

Feasnap won't catch every risk a project faces; the comparison shows how little it costs relative to what's at stake. Riser ↗

Go to market

How we reach them

  1. NowThe founding-access page is live, with a Google search ad campaign built around duplex and townhouse feasibility searches.
  2. NextProperty-investor and small-developer forums and Facebook groups, where feasibility questions are already a constant thread.
  3. LaterPartnerships with building designers and draftspeople who already tell clients to run the numbers before committing to plans.

Where we are

Validating demand before building

  1. Problem researchReal complaints collected from public sources and scored
  2. Demand test · nowFounding-member applications open at feasnap.thinksimple.app, with a targeted search ad campaign built for it
  3. BuildOnly if the demand test shows people will sign up

Signup numbers will be shared here once there are enough to mean something.

Get in touch

Interested in backing Feasnap?

We’re happy to talk through the research, the demand test and the plan.

[email protected]

For information only. This is not an offer of securities or financial advice. Feasnap is in development; nothing described here is available yet. Market figures and charts are estimates built from the sources shown.